Publication Detail
China’s Electric Car Frustration
UCD-ITS-RP-15-01 Journal Article China Center for Energy and Transportation, Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways (STEPS) |
Suggested Citation:
Wan, Zheng, Daniel Sperling, Yunshi Wang (2015) China’s Electric Car Frustration. Transportation Research Part D 34, 116 - 121
By 2020, the vehicle population in China will likely exceed 280 million—exacerbating national energy security, urban air pollution, and traffic congestion. In response, many local and regional governments in China are pursuing an expanding array of measures to restrain growth in personal vehicle ownership and, along with the central government, reducing emissions and energy use of vehicles. One prominent strategy is the promotion of new energy vehicles, especially plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). Large subsidies were offered—up to $27,600 (171,000 RMB) per vehicle in some regions, including almost $9200 (57,000 RMB) from the central government—which suggests that China is making a major commitment to PEVs. But sales have been meager. In 2013, only 17,600 PEVs, mostly buses and utility trucks, were sold, less than 0.1% of total civilian vehicle sales. Several factors explain the failure of PEV sales to take off: (1) protectionism by local governments; (2) uncertainty over which electric-drive vehicle technologies to promote and what consumers are willing to pay, (3) lagging investments in charging infrastructure, and (4) conservative investment behavior by automakers and battery manufacturers. The central government issued directives to local governments in late 2013 to reduce barriers to out-of-town companies, resulting in modest sales increases in early 2014, but a more coherent, broader, and effective set of policies, incentives, and strategies are needed to overcome consumer and industry resistance and the lack of charging infrastructure.
Key words: Plug-in electric vehicle, Auto industry, Local protectionism, Charging infrastructure
Key words: Plug-in electric vehicle, Auto industry, Local protectionism, Charging infrastructure
Available online at: DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.014