Publication Detail
Understanding the Future of Lithium: Part 2, Temporally and Spatially Resolved Lifeâ€Cycle Assessment Modeling
UCD-ITS-RP-19-83 Journal Article Available online at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12942 |
Suggested Citation:
Ambrose, Hanjiro and Alissa Kendall (2019) Understanding the Future of Lithium: Part 2, Temporally and Spatially Resolved Lifeâ€Cycle Assessment Modeling. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Journal Article UCD-ITS-RP-19-83
An array of emerging technologies, from electric vehicles to renewable energy systems, relies on largeâ€format lithium ion batteries (LIBs). LIBs are a critical enabler of clean energy technologies commonly associated with air pollution and greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. However, LIBs require lithium, and expanding the supply of lithium requires new lithium production capacity, which, in turn, changes the environmental impacts associated with lithium production since different resource types and ore qualities will be exploited. A question of interest is whether this will lead to significant changes in the environmental impacts of primary lithium over time. Part one of this twoâ€part article series describes the development of a novel resource production model that predicts future lithium demand and production characteristics (e.g., timing, location, and ore type). In this article, part two, the forecast is coupled with anticipatory lifeâ€cycle assessment (LCA) modeling to estimate the environmental impacts of producing batteryâ€grade lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) each year between 2018 and 2100.
The result is a normalized lifeâ€cycle impact intensity for LCE that reflects the changing resource type, quantity, and region of production. Sustained growth in lithium demands through 2100 necessitates extraction of lower grade resources and mineral deposits, especially after 2050. Despite the reliance on lower grade resources and differences in impact intensity for LCE production from each deposit, the LCA results show only small to modest increases in impact, for example, carbon intensity increases from 3.2 kg CO2e/kg LCE in 2020 to 3.3 kg CO2e/kg LCE in 2100.
Key words: batteries, dynamic modeling, electric vehicles, lifeâ€cycle assessment (LCA), resource depletion, technology and environment
Key words: batteries, dynamic modeling, electric vehicles, lifeâ€cycle assessment (LCA), resource depletion, technology and environment